data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc981/fc981498f438aa9eb86fded0cd7b0999c269516b" alt="zv62"
Joel Armia was part of Team Finland’s lineup for their opening game of the tournament against the United States. Despite their defense being decimated by injuries, Finland took an early 1-0 lead. Although they stayed close, trailing 2-1 after two periods, the USA exploded for four goals in the third period, securing a 6-1 victory. While the final score didn’t reflect Finland’s performance in the first two periods, the coaching staff felt a change was needed.
Kaapo Kakko will replace Armia in Finland’s lineup, bringing a more offensive edge to a team lacking in firepower. However, the USA game demonstrated that Finland’s strength lies in defensive play, not high-scoring affairs. Historically, Finland’s best chances come from grinding down opponents and winning low-scoring, defensive games, making this decision to swap Armia for Kakko puzzling.
Armia is one of Finland’s best defensive players, second only to Aleksander Barkov. Kakko, a much more offensive-minded player, is a significant downgrade in defensive play, and Finland will miss Armia’s presence in the bottom six and on the penalty kill. While Kakko’s inclusion in the lineup may provide an offensive boost, keeping Armia would have been a better decision, especially for a team that relies on defense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b636e/b636ec136675f6c2e112a600e6591f7c2357d395" alt="Forward Joel Armia agrees to two-year deal with Montreal Canadiens | NHLPA.com"
In a short tournament like this, Finland can’t afford to wait to make adjustments. If they lose to Sweden, their gold medal hopes are over, so it’s understandable why they’d want to get Kakko into the lineup. Still, this change raises questions, especially given Armia’s solid numbers this season, which are only slightly behind Kakko’s despite playing a more limited role on a deeper Seattle Kraken team.
One factor that may have influenced the decision is the lack of penalties being called, as NHL referees are officiating the tournament. If Finland believes there will be fewer special teams opportunities, Armia’s penalty-killing skills become less of a factor. Additionally, Armia wasn’t as effective on the penalty kill in the loss to the USA, as the Americans scored on two of their four power plays. If Finland’s gamble pays off and Kakko helps lead them to victory, this decision may be justified, but it could prove costly if they fall short.
Leave a Reply